Classical Technique Bias in Singing - A Primer

For centuries, classical singing technique has been the cornerstone of vocal pedagogy. Its emphasis on breath control, support, resonance, and diction has produced countless celebrated voices and has been regarded as the gold standard for teaching vocalists across genres. However, an unwavering allegiance to classical techniques by some singing teachers may inadvertently introduce biases and limitations that can hinder the development of singers who aspire to excel in non-classical genres. This article delves into the bias towards classical technique and the potential dangers of this singular focus.

Classical Technique: The Bias

The bias towards classical technique stems from its historical roots and the long-standing tradition of Western music. Classical technique has been meticulously developed, taught, and documented, often being synonymous with "proper" or "healthy" singing. Consequently, some vocal educators have come to view it as universally applicable, sometimes to the exclusion of other stylistic techniques.

However, the techniques and stylistic demands of non-classical genres such as jazz, pop, rock, musical theatre, and contemporary commercial music (CCM) often differ substantially from the classical approach. These styles may require different uses of timbre, vocal effects, microphone technique, and emotional delivery that classical training doesn't always address.

The Dangers of a One-Size-Fits-All Approach

Technique Mismatch: Singers trained exclusively in classical technique might find themselves ill-equipped for the demands of contemporary genres. For example, belting—a common technique used in musical theatre and pop music—requires a different approach to vocal tract geometry and breath than classical singing. Teachers who discourage or are unable to teach non-classical techniques may limit their students' versatility and marketability.

Vocal Health Risks: While classical technique prioritizes the longevity and health of the voice, insisting on its methods for non-classical singing can be counterproductive or even harmful. Each genre has its own set of technical demands and risks; therefore, teachers must adapt their instruction to ensure vocal health across diverse repertoires. Misapplying classical techniques to styles that demand a different approach can lead to vocal strain and injury. And let’s face it, the research simply does not support that Classical singing technique reduces the risk of injury. 

Artistic Limitation: A strict adherence to classical norms can stifle a singer's artistic expression in genres that thrive on personal style and improvisation. Non-classical music often requires a level of spontaneity and emotional rawness that classical technique, with its focus on precision and control, may not accommodate.

Cultural Insensitivity: The elevation of classical technique can sometimes disregard the cultural origins and values of non-classical music styles. This can lead to a homogenization of vocal training that fails to respect and nurture the diverse artistic expressions present in these genres.

Educational Narrowness: Singing teachers with a bias towards classical technique may not stay current with the latest research and developments in vocal science that pertain to non-classical singing. This lack of continuing education can result in outdated teaching methods that don't serve the modern singer's needs.

Balancing Singing Tradition with Innovation

To avoid the pitfalls of a classical technique bias, singing teachers should consider the following:

Holistic Education: Vocal educators should strive to provide a holistic approach that respects the technical and stylistic demands of various genres. This approach includes being well-versed in multiple vocal styles and understanding their unique physical and aesthetic requirements.

Health and Versatility: Instruction should prioritize the health of the singer's voice across all styles. Teachers should equip students with a versatile technique toolkit that allows them to adapt safely to the genre in which they choose to specialize or explore.

Lifelong Learning: Teachers must commit to lifelong learning and professional development to stay informed about advances in vocal pedagogy across genres. Engaging with a community of diverse vocal practitioners enhances a teacher's ability to provide comprehensive and relevant instruction. You are doing a great job, you are here engaging with this article, keep up the great work.

Conclusion

While classical singing technique offers invaluable principles that have stood the test of time, the world of vocal music is rich and varied, demanding a more inclusive and adaptable approach. Singing teachers must be mindful not to impose a classical framework on all singers but rather embrace and teach the diverse techniques that honor the integrity of various musical genres. By doing so, they will nurture well-rounded vocalists capable of thriving in a dynamic musical landscape, preserving vocal health, and expressing a broad spectrum of human emotion and cultural expression through their art.

Josh Manuel

Josh Manuel, a voice instructor and founder of VoiceScience, is dedicated to empowering singers by providing evidence-based techniques and knowledge for enhanced performance and vocal health. His expertise and passion in the field of vocal science have made him a trusted resource for singers seeking to improve their skills and achieve their full potential.

Our goal at VoSci is to provide the most accurate and up to date information available on the internet for singers and teachers. While we strive for perfection, there is a lot of misinformation available and new information that becomes available every day. If you find information on this page or any page on VoSci that you believe is out of date please let us know using our contact form so we can look into it.